Curated By Experts

Free Forever

Find in 30 Seconds

Updated Daily

Cursor vs Windsurf

Side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, pros and cons

Cursor

Freemium

4.5

AI-native code editor built on VS Code with deep codebase indexing and a credit-based pricing model. Reached 1M+ monthly active users in 2025 and added a Marketplace for extensions and JetBrains plugin support. The Composer agent can apply multi-file edits with a single instruction, making it the most popular dedicated AI IDE among developers surveyed in Stack Overflow 2025.

Category:AI Coding

Features

Codebase indexing for whole-repository context in completions
Composer: multi-file AI edit agent with diff review before applying
Chat mode with @ references for files, docs, symbols, and web
Credit-based pricing with premium models (Claude 4.6, GPT-4o, o3)
Cursor Marketplace for extensions and community tools
+3 more

Pros

1M+ users validates real-world adoption and ensures long-term support and development
Composer multi-file editing reduces refactoring time significantly versus single-file suggestions
JetBrains support means teams using IntelliJ or PyCharm no longer need to switch editors
Codebase indexing makes AI suggestions context-aware across 100K+ line repos, not just the open file

Cons

Credit system is opaque — using premium models (o3, Claude Opus) burns credits fast; $100+/mo for heavy users
Pro plan ($20/mo) includes 500 fast premium requests; exceeding this drops to slow queue or extra charges
Marketplace extensions are community-maintained with variable quality and no official vetting
JetBrains support is newer and has fewer features than the VS Code-based native editor
Requires internet for AI features — not suitable for air-gapped development environments

Windsurf

Freemium

4.0

AI code editor by Codeium built around the Cascade agent architecture, where the AI maintains a persistent understanding of your entire coding session rather than responding to isolated prompts. Cascade can plan and execute multi-step tasks while the developer continues working, with "flows" that track intent across file edits, terminal commands, and test results. Priced at $15–30/mo as a direct Cursor competitor.

Category:AI Coding

Features

Cascade agent with persistent session context across files, terminal, and tests
Flows: continuous AI task tracking that persists through developer interruptions
Windsurf Tab: context-aware multi-line code completion with cross-file awareness
Inline editing with natural language instructions on selected code
Built-in terminal with AI command suggestions and error explanations
+3 more

Pros

Cascade's session persistence means you can pause a multi-hour task and resume without losing AI context
Freemium tier is more generous than Cursor — 5 Cascade flows per day at no cost
Codeium autocomplete is lightweight and fast, consuming fewer resources than Copilot on low-RAM machines
Flows architecture is better suited to iterative feature development than one-shot Composer-style prompts

Cons

Smaller user base than Cursor (estimated 200K vs 1M+) means fewer community resources and extensions
Cascade can lose track of intent in flows longer than ~2 hours, requiring a manual context reset
No JetBrains support as of Q1 2026 — VS Code-based only
Pro plan ($15/mo) limits Cascade flows to 30/month; $30/mo for 90 flows
Codeium's model quality trails Claude and GPT-4o on complex reasoning tasks in the AI chat

Tool	CursorView details →	WindsurfView details →
Pricing	Freemium	Freemium
Rating	4.5	4.0
Category	AI Coding	AI Coding
Description	AI-native code editor built on VS Code with deep codebase indexing and a credit-based pricing model. Reached 1M+ monthly active users in 2025 and added a Marketplace for extensions and JetBrains plugin support. The Composer agent can apply multi-file edits with a single instruction, making it the most popular dedicated AI IDE among developers surveyed in Stack Overflow 2025.	AI code editor by Codeium built around the Cascade agent architecture, where the AI maintains a persistent understanding of your entire coding session rather than responding to isolated prompts. Cascade can plan and execute multi-step tasks while the developer continues working, with "flows" that track intent across file edits, terminal commands, and test results. Priced at $15–30/mo as a direct Cursor competitor.
Features
Codebase indexing for whole-repository context in completions
Composer: multi-file AI edit agent with diff review before applying
Chat mode with @ references for files, docs, symbols, and web
Credit-based pricing with premium models (Claude 4.6, GPT-4o, o3)
Cursor Marketplace for extensions and community tools
JetBrains plugin (IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm) as of 2025
Shadow workspace: preview AI changes before applying to active files
Notepads for reusable context templates across sessions
Cascade agent with persistent session context across files, terminal, and tests
Flows: continuous AI task tracking that persists through developer interruptions
Windsurf Tab: context-aware multi-line code completion with cross-file awareness
Inline editing with natural language instructions on selected code
Built-in terminal with AI command suggestions and error explanations
Codeium autocomplete engine (150M+ parameters, trained on code-specific data)
Live preview for web projects with AI-assisted CSS/layout adjustments
Team collaboration with shared AI configuration and context
Pros
	1M+ users validates real-world adoption and ensures long-term support and development Composer multi-file editing reduces refactoring time significantly versus single-file suggestions JetBrains support means teams using IntelliJ or PyCharm no longer need to switch editors Codebase indexing makes AI suggestions context-aware across 100K+ line repos, not just the open file	Cascade's session persistence means you can pause a multi-hour task and resume without losing AI context Freemium tier is more generous than Cursor — 5 Cascade flows per day at no cost Codeium autocomplete is lightweight and fast, consuming fewer resources than Copilot on low-RAM machines Flows architecture is better suited to iterative feature development than one-shot Composer-style prompts
Cons
	Credit system is opaque — using premium models (o3, Claude Opus) burns credits fast; $100+/mo for heavy users Pro plan ($20/mo) includes 500 fast premium requests; exceeding this drops to slow queue or extra charges Marketplace extensions are community-maintained with variable quality and no official vetting JetBrains support is newer and has fewer features than the VS Code-based native editor Requires internet for AI features — not suitable for air-gapped development environments	Smaller user base than Cursor (estimated 200K vs 1M+) means fewer community resources and extensions Cascade can lose track of intent in flows longer than ~2 hours, requiring a manual context reset No JetBrains support as of Q1 2026 — VS Code-based only Pro plan ($15/mo) limits Cascade flows to 30/month; $30/mo for 90 flows Codeium's model quality trails Claude and GPT-4o on complex reasoning tasks in the AI chat
Website	Visit	Visit

Cursor vs Windsurf - Comparison | AI Deck