Make vs Reclaim.ai

Side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, pros and cons

Freemium

4.1

Visual automation platform (formerly Integromat) known for a scenario builder that makes data transformation and routing logic easier to visualize than Zapier's linear flow model. At $9-16/mo for 10,000-40,000 operations, it sits between free tools and enterprise platforms. Strong for teams doing complex multi-branch data processing without writing code.

Category:Workflow Automation

Features

Visual scenario builder with non-linear, branching workflow visualization
2,000+ app integrations including HTTP/REST and webhooks for custom APIs
Advanced router modules for conditional branching and data filtering
Data store: built-in lightweight database for state persistence between scenarios
JSON/XML parsing and transformation with no-code tools
+3 more

Pros

Non-linear visual builder is significantly clearer than Zapier for workflows with multiple branches and conditions
Operations-based pricing means 1 automation with 5 steps costs 5 ops — often cheaper than per-task Zapier pricing
Data Store allows state to persist between runs without an external database for simple key-value use cases
Free tier includes 1,000 operations/month — enough for testing before committing to a paid plan

Cons

AI node support is limited compared to n8n — building LLM pipelines requires more manual HTTP module work
Scenario builder becomes visually complex (hard to read) on workflows with 30+ modules
Free tier requires manual scenario activation — paid plan required for scheduled automatic runs
No self-hosting option — all data flows through Make's cloud infrastructure
Cost scales linearly with operation count, not workflow count; high-frequency scenarios become expensive at $9/mo base

Visit Website

Reclaim.ai

Freemium

4.5

Reclaim.ai is an AI calendar assistant that automatically finds the best time for habits, tasks, and meetings. Protects your focus time, syncs personal and work calendars, and reschedules intelligently when priorities shift.

Category:Calendar

Features

Smart scheduling
Habit tracking
Task time blocking
Focus time protection
Calendar sync
+3 more

Pros

Great focus time protection
Smart rescheduling
Habit building support
Good free tier
Team features

Cons

Google Calendar mainly
Learning curve
Can over-optimize
Limited integrations

Visit Website

Tool	MakeView details →	Reclaim.aiView details →
Pricing	Freemium	Freemium
Rating	4.1	4.5
Category	Workflow Automation	Calendar
Description	Visual automation platform (formerly Integromat) known for a scenario builder that makes data transformation and routing logic easier to visualize than Zapier's linear flow model. At $9-16/mo for 10,000-40,000 operations, it sits between free tools and enterprise platforms. Strong for teams doing complex multi-branch data processing without writing code.	Reclaim.ai is an AI calendar assistant that automatically finds the best time for habits, tasks, and meetings. Protects your focus time, syncs personal and work calendars, and reschedules intelligently when priorities shift.
Features
Visual scenario builder with non-linear, branching workflow visualization
2,000+ app integrations including HTTP/REST and webhooks for custom APIs
Advanced router modules for conditional branching and data filtering
Data store: built-in lightweight database for state persistence between scenarios
JSON/XML parsing and transformation with no-code tools
Scenario scheduling: minute-level granularity on triggers
Error handling routes for automatic retry and failure notification
Team features: shared scenarios, scenario logs, version history
Smart scheduling
Habit tracking
Task time blocking
Focus time protection
Calendar sync
Team scheduling
Buffer time
Google Calendar integration
Pros
	Non-linear visual builder is significantly clearer than Zapier for workflows with multiple branches and conditions Operations-based pricing means 1 automation with 5 steps costs 5 ops — often cheaper than per-task Zapier pricing Data Store allows state to persist between runs without an external database for simple key-value use cases Free tier includes 1,000 operations/month — enough for testing before committing to a paid plan	Great focus time protection Smart rescheduling Habit building support Good free tier Team features
Cons
	AI node support is limited compared to n8n — building LLM pipelines requires more manual HTTP module work Scenario builder becomes visually complex (hard to read) on workflows with 30+ modules Free tier requires manual scenario activation — paid plan required for scheduled automatic runs No self-hosting option — all data flows through Make's cloud infrastructure Cost scales linearly with operation count, not workflow count; high-frequency scenarios become expensive at $9/mo base	Google Calendar mainly Learning curve Can over-optimize Limited integrations
Website	Visit	Visit